医学教育管理

• 调查研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

基于德尔菲法的医院内科住培师资教学综合评价指标体系的构建与应用研究

  

  1. 首都医科大学附属北京安贞医院教育处,北京 101118
  • 收稿日期:2025-08-13 修回日期:2025-10-16 出版日期:2026-04-10 发布日期:2026-04-10
  • 基金资助:
    北京市属医院科研培育计划项目:建设大型公立医院教学绩效考核信息化体系助力医院高质量发展(PG2022012)

Construction and application of a comprehensive evaluation index system for internal medicine residency training faculty teaching based on the Delphi method

  1. Education Department, Beijing Anzhen Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 101118, China
  • Received:2025-08-13 Revised:2025-10-16 Online:2026-04-10 Published:2026-04-10

摘要:

目的 建立简单、量化、操作性强的指标体系对内科住院医师规范化培训(以下简称住陪)专业基地师资教学工作进行综合评价,用于绩效考核依据。方法 20227月—202312月采用文献研究法、头脑风暴法结合工作实践、医院发展实际设定初步指标,采用德尔菲专家咨询法建立首都医科大学附属北京安贞医院内科住培师资综合评价指标体系。结果 咨询21名专家,经过两轮专家咨询,最终确定内科专业基地住培师资综合评价指标一级指标4个、二级指标16个,其中一级指标包括思想素质、教学工作量、教学质量、教学研究及培训4个维度,权重系数分别为0.26600.26060.26060.2128。结论 本指标的筛选结果数量合理,简单、可量化,导向性强,符合对住培师资的教学投入与效果的客观评价。

Abstract:

Objective To establish a simple, quantifiable, and highly operational indicator system for comprehensively evaluating the teaching performance of faculty members in the internal medicine residency training base, serving as a basis for performance assessment.Methods From July 2022 to December 2023, preliminary indicators were developed using literature review, brainstorming, and considering work practices and the actual development needs of the hospital. The Delphi expert consultation method was employed to establish a comprehensive evaluation indicator system for internal medicine residency training faculty at Beijing Anzhen Hospital, Capital Medical University.Results A total of 21 experts were consulted. After two rounds of expert consultation, the final comprehensive evaluation indicator system for internal medicine residency training faculty consisted of 4 first-level indicators and 16 second-level indicators. The first-level include four dimensions: ideological quality, teaching workload, teaching quality, teaching research and training, with weight coefficients of 0.266 0, 0.260 6, 0.260 6, and 0.212 8, respectively.Conclusion The selected indicators are reasonable in number, simple, quantifiable, and highly targeted, aligning with the objective evaluation of teaching input and outcomes for residency training faculty.

Key words:

 , standardized residency training| internal medicine residency program| clinical faculty| performance evaluation| indicators| Delphi method

中图分类号: